| 1 |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:12:29 -0800 |
| 2 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> I agree that splitting president and secretary into separate roles is |
| 4 |
> a great idea. I feel strongly that rotating these positions often |
| 5 |
> will result in both roles being ineffective, because it takes time to |
| 6 |
> get even decent at either of them. Does anyone want to return to the |
| 7 |
> 4-hour meetings we used to have? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Does returning to 4-hour meetings mean things will no longer keep on |
| 10 |
getting postponed for 'further discussion' that will never happen |
| 11 |
because the meeting ran one second over its allocated time? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives