On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:12:29 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
> I agree that splitting president and secretary into separate roles is
> a great idea. I feel strongly that rotating these positions often
> will result in both roles being ineffective, because it takes time to
> get even decent at either of them. Does anyone want to return to the
> 4-hour meetings we used to have?

Does returning to 4-hour meetings mean things will no longer keep on
getting postponed for 'further discussion' that will never happen
because the meeting ran one second over its allocated time?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh