| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tue, 20 May 2008 13:31:51 -0700
|
| 5 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> People keep asking us for action or a decision one way or the other, and |
| 8 |
> we can't seem to get enough of us saying the same thing at the same time |
| 9 |
> to do anything. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from the |
| 12 |
> council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some options |
| 13 |
> that have been mentioned: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> 1) Have an election now; |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I think this is the best choice because it conforms to policy and
|
| 19 |
shouldn't be all that disruptive.
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have elections; |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Why? I don't see what this gains, besides working contrary to policy
|
| 25 |
and possibly forcing two votes instead of one.
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these |
| 28 |
> reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a council |
| 29 |
> majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Except that's not what policy has as an option.
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> 4) Something else. (What?) |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Which one do you prefer? |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Thanks, |
| 39 |
> Donnie |
| 40 |
> -- |
| 41 |
> gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Regards,
|
| 45 |
Ferris
|
| 46 |
- --
|
| 47 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
|
| 48 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees)
|
| 49 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 50 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkgzR7AACgkQQa6M3+I///dRxACgi+ZLqNln3AoNR0Q5vivAq8Hq
|
| 53 |
SzUAoII/aoUszipMGivMcQgMK9lA8Yhm
|
| 54 |
=o6sO
|
| 55 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 56 |
éí¢‡(ºw"–X¬¶È žÚ(¢¸&j)bž b² |
Archives