| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 2008.09.26 20:57, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 15:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 7 |
[snip] |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > just make the replacement strategies the same. replacement for a |
| 10 |
> booted |
| 11 |
> > slacker is the same for someone who resigns council/Gentoo or is |
| 12 |
> kicked out. |
| 13 |
> > elections take time and are a hassle. selecting from the original |
| 14 |
> list is a |
| 15 |
> > lot simpler. |
| 16 |
> > -mike |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I strongly disagree with this method. People opt to not run for the |
| 20 |
> council when they see what they expect to be a strong council. So if |
| 21 |
> you |
| 22 |
> see you have 8 pretty strong devs and 6 weak ones running. That's |
| 23 |
> good |
| 24 |
> enough sign to make you decline any nominations. As the people get |
| 25 |
> sick |
| 26 |
> etc this defaulting to the next inline can lead to results of the |
| 27 |
> council which could completely and radically destroy Gentoo. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Solar++ |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Allow the remaining council members to recruit any dev for the role, if |
| 33 |
the any dev agrees. Such recruits serve until the next election, when |
| 34 |
they can stand on their merits. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
It allows the council (if they wish) to appoint someone who complements |
| 37 |
the remaining members. It takes a little longer than the |
| 38 |
'inheirentence' method but I would expect it to produce a stronger |
| 39 |
council. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
- -- |
| 42 |
Regards, |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Roy Bamford |
| 45 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
| 46 |
gentoo-ops |
| 47 |
forum-mods |
| 48 |
treecleaners |
| 49 |
trustees |
| 50 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 51 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkjdRTQACgkQTE4/y7nJvauJxACglP5gfqPlOEQ5p5YpH6fHHUnB |
| 54 |
rDMAoInSUExtGCWmp9EKZjiM1DIB3Xiq |
| 55 |
=SJhY |
| 56 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives