1 |
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 11:53 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: |
2 |
> Ned Ludd wrote: |
3 |
> > Luca/lu_zero whats up? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Well, I didn't plan to be busy neither times, I just happen to got worse |
6 |
> than I expect (I was still ill from a bad pneumonia). |
7 |
|
8 |
Sorry to hear that. I hope you start to feel better soon. |
9 |
|
10 |
> Yesterday I hoped to be completely recovered but looks like I was still |
11 |
> too weak... |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Well sucks to be me ^^; |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Beside that, having twice the meetings means more than doubling the |
16 |
> chances to miss them for a reason or another, so I think the whole idea |
17 |
> of the slacker token could be revised accordingly. |
18 |
|
19 |
The so called slacker mark was intended for the 12 month * 1 meeting per |
20 |
month strategy. If you guys moved to a 24 meetings in a 12 month period |
21 |
then yes w/o a doubt it should be revised accordingly. |