On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 11:53 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
> > Luca/lu_zero whats up?
> 
> Well, I didn't plan to be busy neither times, I just happen to got worse 
> than I expect (I was still ill from a bad pneumonia).

Sorry to hear that. I hope you start to feel better soon.

> Yesterday I hoped to be completely recovered but looks like I was still 
> too weak...
> 
> Well sucks to be me ^^;
> 
> Beside that, having twice the meetings means more than doubling the 
> chances to miss them for a reason or another, so I think the whole idea 
> of the slacker token could be revised accordingly.

The so called slacker mark was intended for the 12 month * 1 meeting per
month strategy. If you guys moved to a 24 meetings in a 12 month period
then yes w/o a doubt it should be revised accordingly.