1 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 18:52 -0600, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
3 |
>> We should also get rid of both the slacker rule and proxies. They're |
4 |
>> good examples of over-engineering. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> This is not within the councils power to get rid of. The users voted for |
7 |
> GLEP-39 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html which states |
8 |
> our requirements. Should it not be up to them to change it? |
9 |
|
10 |
So we could just use votify to ask if they are ok to remove them or not. |
11 |
|
12 |
> Re: Best times for meetings.. |
13 |
> Ok so I generally am employed from the hours of 9-5 M-F PST (GMT-7). The |
14 |
> company I work for can have official meetings any day of the week any |
15 |
> hour of the day with not much more than an hours notice. I've been in |
16 |
> the meeting/council channel for over 5 years now. So I clearly have an |
17 |
> interest in what we are doing as a meta distribution, but If I'm unable |
18 |
> to make a meeting and it's scheduled in the time-frame of my work hours |
19 |
> then I can guaranty nothing. It's more likely that I'd have to be in/out |
20 |
> for the duration of the meeting. If proxy is required then I'd call for |
21 |
> a semi perm proxy of the next in line on the vote rankings. At least |
22 |
> till it causes a personal conflict of interest. |
23 |
|
24 |
Ok... |
25 |
|
26 |
> We can vote on the +m/+v thing if you want to make it official. But it |
27 |
> seems we had a general consensus from everybody that this is what would |
28 |
> be best. |
29 |
|
30 |
Well, to make it simpler we could just reply in this thread, I'm in favor. |
31 |
|
32 |
lu |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
|
36 |
Luca Barbato |
37 |
Gentoo Council Member |
38 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
39 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |