List Archive: gentoo-council
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Ferris McCormick wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Try thinking about this from a different perspective: What is best for
> > Gentoo? If the rules are broken, they should get fixed instead of
> > blindly followed.
Agreed, but it needs to be a clear procedure. "more positive than
negative" isn't a clear and comprehensible criteria as it leaves much
room for discussion. Fixing broken rules with another
may-be-somewhat-broken rule won't help us.
> To save some virtual trees, I'll respond to your other email about your
> and Ciaran's "nobody" proposal. Good idea, put me in the "support"
Count me in as well for that idea. Having that "nobody" person running
in the election allows us to have a clear and comprehensible breakup
between those candidates who could easily fill a gap and those who don't
(and therefore when it's time to hold an election for a person filling
that gap). It still leaves one question open: What to do when "nobody"
is elected on the 5th or 6th position (or even the 1st ...)?
Gentoo Linux - Die Metadistribution
signature.asc (Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil)