List Archive: gentoo-council
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
>>>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
> 3. Preservation of file modification times
> - ulm asked us to vote on it if EAPI 3 is not close to release
> - from the agenda thread there doesn't seem to be a consensus
> among PM developers on how to best approach this
Actually, my request was more explicit:
If the council accepts mtime preservation, decide which option it
should be, as outlined in bug 264130 comment 26 :
A: current Portage and Pkgcore behaviour, all mtimes are preserved
B: optional update of "old" mtimes
C: mandatory update
Could you add this to the agenda please?