Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-council@g.o
From: Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o>
Subject: Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:39:45 -0400
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:00:03AM -0400, Thomas Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:26:39AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Thomas Anderson wrote:
> That's not a technical objection in my opinion. That's an objection that
> the doc doesn't go far enough, to which the answer is that it's the
> first step. Just because the first step doesn't go as far as some would
> like isn't a reason to take the first step.

Make that "isn't a reason not to take the first step". *sigh*

-- 
---------
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/////////
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
---------



References:
Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
-- Thomas Anderson
Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
-- Luca Barbato
Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
-- Thomas Anderson
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Next by thread:
Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Previous by date:
Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Next by date:
Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-council mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.