Archives
Archives
| From: | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>, gentoo-council@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement | ||
| Date: | Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:25:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1203024298.4132.6.camel@hangover | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement by Roy Bamford |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 20:45 +0000, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | [snip] |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > Ned, |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > I think very few ex-proctors would be jumping in for a second helping |
| 8 | > after the way they were supported by the council that created them. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | That's probably very true and I can't blame them. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 15 | Gentoo Linux |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |