On Friday 25 December 2009 09:00:36 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a
> >> thread at gentoo-dev ML:
> >> agenda topic: Discussion and approval for following item:
> >> Adding real multilib features from current multilib-portage to currently
> >> hardmasked and testing portage-2.2* for wider testing, more eyes looking
> >> at it and hopefully more people helping improving it, so we can get a
> >> version, which most can accept for PMS and maybe next EAPI.
> > Sorry, I forgot to send an email explaining what happened on the
> > council alias as promised. The consensus was that the project wasn't
> > mature enough to go ahead. Also more generally the council's job isn't
> > discussing but deciding, approving, etc... Discussing is what should
> > happen on mailing lists.
> Since i see noone arguing against adding the multilib features to current
> testing branch of portage, the discussion part already seems to be done.
> so a simple approval is ok, drop the discussion request.
that's incorrect. you still havent addressed my outstanding issues. until
you do, i dont see how you can push for this being added to portage. or i
missed some update along the way, but the last e-mail i see is from me dated