List Archive: gentoo-council
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2009.07.07 04:20, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 18:52 -0600, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> > We should also get rid of both the slacker rule and proxies.
> > good examples of over-engineering.
> This is not within the councils power to get rid of. The users voted
> GLEP-39 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html which
> our requirements. Should it not be up to them to change it?
I think you mean developers not users but that's a bye the way.
Authority comes to the council in two forms, that which is delegated
(by glep39) and that which they assume.
The limits of the latter are only determined by trial and error. If the
council deceided to get rid of slacker marks and proxies I doubt there
would be a backlash from the electorate. The council is supposed to be
representative of the developers they represent.
(NeddySeagoon) a member of
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----