1 |
On 8/24/08, Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:39:35AM -0400, Thomas Anderson wrote: |
3 |
>> Let me see if I understand the council's reasoning... |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> If dev A gets retired by devrel for insufficient reasons(what those |
6 |
>> reasons are are irrelevant to this discussion), and his behaviour does |
7 |
>> not change after his retirement(as he never had wrong behaviour), then |
8 |
>> dev A's appeal is rejected? |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Now, some may say that this is the reason Council reviewed the |
11 |
>> evidence(did that really happen?). To prove my point, I'd like to ask |
12 |
>> the council(and anyone else interested in devrel/council policy) |
13 |
>> what reasons it found, looking through the evidence |
14 |
>> provided, that any of the three developers were a security risk, I |
15 |
>> certainly didn't see any. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> Needless to say, I'm very disappointed in this decision. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> Please keep discussion on gentoo-project. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> Regards, |
23 |
>> Thomas |
24 |
> |
25 |
> To Clear up confusion expressed by at least one person, my Mail wasn't just |
26 |
> about |
27 |
> myself being confused about the wording of the announcement email. It |
28 |
> was about my frustration at the Council's decision because their |
29 |
> supposed procedure for appeals didn't happen in this case. In |
30 |
> Philantrop's case at least, his behaviour since the retirement has been |
31 |
> almost perfect(a devrel member even asserted this), yet his appeal was |
32 |
> rejected. |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
In my not so humble opinion I think they have spent enough time on |
36 |
this matter already. |
37 |
|
38 |
I imagine if they were to spend more you will still not be satisfied; |
39 |
so my question to you is; what do you expect to change? |
40 |
|
41 |
Do you expect the council to re-review everything and let him back in? |
42 |
Do you expect the council to modify their processes and if so how? Do |
43 |
you have ideas for them to improve? |
44 |
|
45 |
-Alec |