From: | Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-council@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54: _live or _scm? | ||
Date: | Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:39:49 | ||
Message-Id: | 1244140706.6249.0.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54: _live or _scm? by Ulrich Mueller |
1 | Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 | > I prefer "_live" for various reasons: |
3 | > |
4 | > - Almost everybody calls them "live ebuilds" not "scm ebuilds" |
5 | > - There may be live ebuilds not related to source code management |
6 | > (app-portage/eclass-manpages might be an example), and ebuilds |
7 | > fetching their sources from a fixed tag in an SCM system, therefore |
8 | > not being live. |
9 | > - No confusion with the Scheme language. |
10 | |
11 | +1 on that. live ist the more obvious solution. |
12 | |
13 | Tobias |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |