Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-council@g.o
From: Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o>
Subject: Re: GLEP 54: _live or _scm?
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:38:26 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I prefer "_live" for various reasons:
> 
> - Almost everybody calls them "live ebuilds" not "scm ebuilds"
> - There may be live ebuilds not related to source code management
>   (app-portage/eclass-manpages might be an example), and ebuilds
>   fetching their sources from a fixed tag in an SCM system, therefore
>   not being live.
> - No confusion with the Scheme language.

+1 on that. live ist the more obvious solution.

  Tobias

Attachment:
signature.asc (Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil)
References:
GLEP 54: _live or _scm?
-- Piotr JaroszyƄski
Re: GLEP 54: _live or _scm?
-- Ulrich Mueller
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: GLEP 54: _live or _scm?
Next by thread:
Re: GLEP 54: _live or _scm?
Previous by date:
Council meeting summary for meeting on May 28, 2009
Next by date:
Question I had while writing my devmanual patch about eclasses


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-council mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.