1 |
On 2010.04.11 14:16, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> Hello folks, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Looking through the Council project page, the policy regarding the |
5 |
> inactive |
6 |
> council members doesn't look optimal to me |
7 |
> |
8 |
> "To ensure that the council stays active, the chosen metastructure |
9 |
> model says |
10 |
> that if a council member (or their appointed proxy) fails to show up |
11 |
> for two |
12 |
> consecutive meetings, they are marked as a slacker." |
13 |
[snip] |
14 |
|
15 |
Markos, |
16 |
|
17 |
Thats from GLEP39. The council has already ruled that they cannot |
18 |
change GLEP39 without a general vote of all Gentoo devs. |
19 |
|
20 |
This suggests you need to present your proposals as an amendment to |
21 |
GLEP39 and that all devs need to vote on it. |
22 |
|
23 |
Others have already pointed out a few issues with your proposal, so |
24 |
I'll stop there. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Regards, |
28 |
|
29 |
Roy Bamford |
30 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
31 |
gentoo-ops |
32 |
forum-mods |
33 |
trustees |