List Archive: gentoo-council
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 25.7.2010 2.55, Alex Alexander wrote:
> following is the Council Agenda proposal for the upcoming meeting on
> Monday, July 26th.
> * allow all members to show up (5 min)
> ** vote **
> add --as-needed to default profile's LDFLAGS
> ** discuss / vote **
> - required-use: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html
> - review eclass removal policy
> should it be 2 years since portage 184.108.40.206 went stable?
> - should there a policy about eclass API changes?
> - use of invalid DEPEND atom "EAPI_TOO_OLD" instead of calling die in
> global scope on eclasses
> and replies
> - mailing lists
> should we post council agenda to -council? -dev? -project?
We should handle punting -council first. If it survives then -council is
the logical choice.
> some devs suggest we should cross-post to -dev and -council
> but not everyone likes cross-posting as it can lead to fragmentation
The outcome of the cross-posting thread on gentoo-project is that cross
posting is only allowed when using gentoo-dev-announce.