| 1 |
On 25.7.2010 2.55, Alex Alexander wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> following is the Council Agenda proposal for the upcoming meeting on |
| 5 |
> Monday, July 26th. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> * allow all members to show up (5 min) |
| 8 |
> ** vote ** |
| 9 |
> add --as-needed to default profile's LDFLAGS |
| 10 |
> ** discuss / vote ** |
| 11 |
> - required-use: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html |
| 12 |
> - review eclass removal policy |
| 13 |
> should it be 2 years since portage 2.1.4.4 went stable? |
| 14 |
> - should there a policy about eclass API changes? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> - use of invalid DEPEND atom "EAPI_TOO_OLD" instead of calling die in |
| 17 |
> global scope on eclasses |
| 18 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_dee3aab5e8c840ed3fa4add9c7d74b97.xml |
| 19 |
> and replies |
| 20 |
> - mailing lists |
| 21 |
> should we post council agenda to -council? -dev? -project? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
We should handle punting -council first. If it survives then -council is |
| 24 |
the logical choice. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> some devs suggest we should cross-post to -dev and -council |
| 27 |
> but not everyone likes cross-posting as it can lead to fragmentation |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
The outcome of the cross-posting thread on gentoo-project is that cross |
| 30 |
posting is only allowed when using gentoo-dev-announce. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Regards, |
| 33 |
Petteri |
Archives