| 1 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:45:48 -0400 |
| 2 |
Andrew D Kirch <trelane@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Its the opinion of the User Relations team that the Council should |
| 4 |
> reconsider the current Leadership in charge of the PMS Standards |
| 5 |
> Working group. Its the feeling of User Relations that interested |
| 6 |
> parties in the PMS standard are being hindered by communication |
| 7 |
> issues on the process and procedures required to implement changes. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I agree. I'd like the Council to appoint a qualitied PMS leader who is |
| 10 |
empowered to moderate posts to gentoo-dev@ from people who consistently |
| 11 |
post FUD about EAPI and PMS related issues. I believe that doing so |
| 12 |
will substantially reduce the amount of noise involved in the |
| 13 |
discussion, and will enable us to have sensible PMS related discussions |
| 14 |
without them being derailed by trolls. Also, it'll be harder for those |
| 15 |
trolls to post nonsense like "PMS isn't for Portage" and "PMS is about |
| 16 |
Exherbo, not Gentoo" if a Gentoo developer is prepared to step in and |
| 17 |
address all the crap instead of leaving it to me... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I suggest asking any potential candidates to start by addressing bug |
| 20 |
282470. That should give a good indication of how well they're going to |
| 21 |
work with the people who do the grunt work on PMS. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives