On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
<ciaran.mccreesh@...> wrote:
> Could you add in something like:
> "Agree upon a wording for PMS for the mtime modification change
> introduced to EAPI 3 last time"

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
> I'd like council to discuss what I consider a major bug in PMS -
> see the discussion at
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-pms/msg_95a13d880eb521b13d7090f30350c26a.xml

Could the both of you please flesh out a proposal on how you'd expect
the council to solve these issues? It would best if, on top of telling
what should be done, you explained why it should be done this way.
Raising the questions is already interesting but proposing answers is
even better. You may have done that elsewhere before but summarizing
it here would help tremendously. And by the way those who know they
will disagree with the above posters are welcome to make proposals of
their own. It would be nice if we'd all get an opportunity to discuss
it here before the council meeting.

Denis.