Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
Cc: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>, gentoo-council@l.g.o, zmedico@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:11:44
Message-Id: 49B46CD9.6050202@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009 by "Petteri Räty"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Petteri Räty wrote:
5 > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
6 >> Furthermore, why do I need to prod people for an update? When you commit
7 >> to a date, you should be minimally sending out *something* on that date
8 >> to let us know what is blocking progress. I don't enjoy acting like a
9 >> mother hen, and I can't imagine it's terribly fun from the other end
10 >> either.
11 >>
12 >
13 > Zac promised me he would implemented the code into Portage but he hasn't
14 > done it yet as far as I know.
15
16 I think I can get it done sometime this week.
17 - --
18 Thanks,
19 Zac
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
22
23 iEYEARECAAYFAkm0bNgACgkQ/ejvha5XGaMfVACgme62b4J65WvSq/URoXK55yea
24 H+gAniG9s2qCsLBS8l3Vr1vUlsvOo/b8
25 =OZd5
26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----