Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-council <gentoo-council@g.o>
From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
Subject: Re: The slacker mark
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:26:59 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi.

Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 15:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Friday 26 September 2008, Torsten Veller wrote:
>>> We should clearify the "new election" part in time. I think this council
>>> started in July 2008 and there will be many meetings that can be missed
>>> in the next 9 month.
>>>
>>> As there is already a replacement strategy for devs leaving the council
>>> (take the next ranked candidate if the council agrees, else elect one)
>>> one might think to use the same for a slacker missing any further
>>> meeting. But that doesn't work as the slacker can be elected again:
>> just make the replacement strategies the same.  replacement for a booted 
>> slacker is the same for someone who resigns council/Gentoo or is kicked out.  
>> elections take time and are a hassle.  selecting from the original list is a 
>> lot simpler.
>> -mike
> 
> 
> I strongly disagree with this method. People opt to not run for the
> council when they see what they expect to be a strong council. So if you
> see you have 8 pretty strong devs and 6 weak ones running. That's good
> enough sign to make you decline any nominations. As the people get sick
> etc this defaulting to the next inline can lead to results of the
> council which could completely and radically destroy Gentoo.

Ned,

I understand your point, but the rule is that the remaining council
members can opt to select the next in line or to open an election for
the vacant spot. So going down the line isn't automatic.
Perhaps we should also add a rule that if 50% (other percentage?) of the
original council is replaced, we need to have a new election.


- --
Regards,

Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkjdfdMACgkQcAWygvVEyAI7pgCgimAhLkl9Rup5QIHrCuYUuL8T
85QAnjpyi7QAF3Q2rVm1Q5VRIcDEClBw
=sRPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


References:
The slacker mark
-- Torsten Veller
Re: The slacker mark
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: The slacker mark
-- Ned Ludd
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: The slacker mark
Next by thread:
Re: The slacker mark
Previous by date:
Re: The slacker mark
Next by date:
Re: The slacker mark


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.