Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Vote: What next?
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 22:29:04
Message-Id: 1211322540.27772.16.camel@hangover
In Reply to: [gentoo-council] Vote: What next? by Donnie Berkholz
1 On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 13:31 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2 > People keep asking us for action or a decision one way or the other, and
3 > we can't seem to get enough of us saying the same thing at the same time
4 > to do anything.
5 >
6 > To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from the
7 > council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some options
8 > that have been mentioned:
9 >
10 > 1) Have an election now;
11 >
12 > 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have elections;
13 >
14 > 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these
15 > reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a council
16 > majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or
17
18 #1 and #2 are stupid.
19 #3 is the only option.
20
21 It was a non-meeting. I noticed in one of your mails that somebody
22 thought I was supposed to attend cuz I was proxying for vapier a few
23 days before. It's ridiculias to assume that either one of us even knew
24 there was a meeting. Plus.. Council already meet it's requirements for 1
25 open monthly meeting.
26
27 So.. Don't be fooled. The foundation or anybody else can't force you do
28 step down or hold new elections. Why? Cuz nobody did anything wrong.
29
30 --
31 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
32 Gentoo Linux
33
34 --
35 gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list