List Archive: gentoo-council
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Luca Barbato wrote:
> I'd just ask portage devs what is their take and go with it.
Quoting Zac from <http://bugs.gentoo.org/264130#c31>:
| For the record, I'm in favor of unconditional preservation of mtimes.
| If the package manager assumes a role in changing mtimes then that's
| taking control away from the ebuild and that seems like an unnecessary
| potential source of conflict.