Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:20:33 +0200
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Luca Barbato wrote:

> I'd just ask portage devs what is their take and go with it.

Quoting Zac from <http://bugs.gentoo.org/264130#c31>:
| For the record, I'm in favor of unconditional preservation of mtimes.
| If the package manager assumes a role in changing mtimes then that's
| taking control away from the ebuild and that seems like an unnecessary
| potential source of conflict.

Ulrich


Replies:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12
-- Ned Ludd
References:
Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12
-- Petteri R├Ąty
Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12
-- Luca Barbato
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12
Previous by date:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12
Next by date:
Re: Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12


Updated Nov 13, 2011

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-council mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.