| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Chrissy Fullam wrote: |
| 5 |
|> Can people be entirely banned from Gentoo? |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
| By technical merit I'd not say that anything is entirely outside of |
| 8 |
| technical ability if one has that ability to circumvent the system. |
| 9 |
Doesn't |
| 10 |
| mean we should throw the towel in and just sit back to take abuse though. |
| 11 |
| |
| 12 |
|> - What would such a ban include? Some ideas -- the person could not: |
| 13 |
|> - Post to any gentoo mailing list; |
| 14 |
|> - Post to gentoo bugzilla; |
| 15 |
|> - Participate in #gentoo- IRC channels; |
| 16 |
|> - Contribute to gentoo (hence my corner case of a security fix) except |
| 17 |
|> perhaps through a proxy; |
| 18 |
| |
| 19 |
| Mailing list rights and bugzilla rights for that email address would be |
| 20 |
[snip] |
| 21 |
Not to pick on you musikc, but can we all stop using the term 'rights' |
| 22 |
please. Regarding anything the infrastructure team provides, the proper |
| 23 |
term is privilege. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
TIA |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- -- |
| 28 |
======================================================= |
| 29 |
Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org |
| 30 |
Gentoo Infrastructure |
| 31 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead |
| 32 |
GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 |
| 33 |
======================================================= |
| 34 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
iJwEAQECAAYFAkh9YtAACgkQgGui5Bn0rgUR6AP/XQGPbymLZhZ53qmK8oU3SauG |
| 38 |
BI3OC7jQ1CMUr2HLUNvSYDO8q/PIu9PKO9/AjBA7EEEtRtmt2ic6lWAS/+JfcPsE |
| 39 |
TCYWs7kV+xpPmQRPziTR1Vz6lsV+3t+M6V/0Kl2UcWp2M/tvc+yLIHN+TfOiq4Xj |
| 40 |
oI8+r3Hu012kD1a/yOQ= |
| 41 |
=+kRN |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives