Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
On 16:42 Thu 08 Nov , Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 04:05:07AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > All this team's actions must be approved by the lead within a short time
> > period or must be reverted. It's expected that many actions will range
> > from 6-12 hours, so 12 hours seems like a reasonable time to require
> > lead approval. Whenever the lead is unavailable, approval falls to the
> > council. (Remember, two council members together can make decisions.)
>
> I like the spirit, but I'm not sure how feasible this is in practice.
> In any case, they should be documented (e.g. sent to some private list
> where the lead and council can see it).
I agree that it would be infeasible if this were a regular occurrence.
My and Ferris's expectations were that it would be fairly rare, but we
don't have much real-world data to bear that out. Could you share some
from your experience with the original proctors?
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-council@g.o mailing list
|
|