Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: "Donnie Berkholz" <dberkholz@g.o>
From: "Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o>
Subject: Re: Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:23:59 +0000

 1.1

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
> Can people be entirely banned from Gentoo?

no

>
> - What would such a ban include? Some ideas -- the person could not:
>  - Post to any gentoo mailing list;

technically feasible

>  - Post to gentoo bugzilla;

technically feasible

>  - Participate in #gentoo- IRC channels;

technically infeasible.  Also a hard sell; traditionally gentoo-*
channels that are not #gentoo-dev and #gentoo are owned and operated
by gentoo subprojects with the permission of the gentoo reps.
Enforcing a ban in all channels would be difficult.

>  - Contribute to gentoo (hence my corner case of a security fix) except
>    perhaps through a proxy;

nothing stops them from contributing to the community; it is not as if
Gentoo controls all outlets anyway.

>
> - Why would we do it?

To prevent gentoo from being messed with by people who have routinely
proven that they are unfit to assist the distribution.

>
> - Under whose authority would it happen?

Userrel.

>
> - Would it be reversible? What conditions would cause this?

I assume the person would ask to return or have someone vouch for them.

>
>  Since the banned person couldn't participate in Gentoo, we'd never
>  know whether anything changed.

I would think that if the person wanted to come back they would:

  Make an effort to contact Gentoo; It is not as if developers would
not talk to this individual.
  Gentoo itself would take this person back provisionally to ensure
things were different.  This is
  a case by case deal and I think is difficult to pin down.

>
> - How would one appeal this? Would there be a chance to respond before
>  the ban?

Since the ban would require some amount of history I don't see any
particular reason not to solicit feedback from said person.

>
> - Would moderating the gentoo-dev mailing list obsolete this concept?

If moderating gentoo-dev obsoletes this concept then I think the
concept itself is flawed (gentoo is more than gentoo-dev)

>
> --
> Thanks,
> Donnie
>
> Donnie Berkholz
> Developer, Gentoo Linux
> Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
>
-- 
gentoo-council@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement
-- Ferris McCormick
References:
Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement
-- Donnie Berkholz
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement
Next by thread:
Re: Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement
Previous by date:
Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement
Next by date:
Re: Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement


Sep 04, 2008

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.