| 1 |
Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
| 2 |
> Here's the agenda for our september 14th meeting (18 UTC), held on |
| 3 |
> #gentoo-council |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> 3. EAPI/PMS (30 Minutes) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> 3.1. A process to modify PMS standard that doesn't directly involve |
| 10 |
> the EAPI process. |
| 11 |
> As requested by "Joshua Jackson" <tsunam@××××××.org> / User relations: |
| 12 |
> Required people: tsuname, ulm |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> "Per bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273261 I'm requesting an |
| 15 |
> AOB for the decision that was made by the PMS team about a process or |
| 16 |
> system to modify the PMS standard that doesn't directly involve the EAPI |
| 17 |
> process currently. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I've set the hard date for them for the sept 10th meeting and this gives |
| 20 |
> them 3 weeks to work on this so it should be no issue for them to come |
| 21 |
> to this. I'm expecting them to be able to have a result by then." |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> 3.2 EAPI / PMS comittee. If we do need/want one, vote on a structure: |
| 24 |
> Required people: ulm |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> 3.2.1 Either we form a new committee / working group for EAPI and |
| 27 |
> PMS questions (more or less Calchan's proposal). I'd guess there |
| 28 |
> should be one or two members from the council, plus someone from |
| 29 |
> the PMS project, and a representative for each package manager. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> 3.2.2 In principle also the PMS project could play this role, but |
| 32 |
> with its current membership of only three devs it is too weak. So |
| 33 |
> some relevant people (see above) would have to join. OTOH, there's |
| 34 |
> already a bugzie alias (pms-bugs), a mailing list (gentoo-pms) and |
| 35 |
> an IRC channel set up. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> 3.2.3 Something (completely) different. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
This failed to include USERREL's actions taken in: |
| 40 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282157, |
| 41 |
these include a request that the leadership in PMS change: |
| 42 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282157#c16 |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
"About the recurring issues involving PMS, the User Relations team decided to |
| 45 |
make the following recommendation: |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
Its the opinion of the User Relations team that the Council should reconsider |
| 48 |
the current Leadership in charge of the PMS Standards Working group. Its the |
| 49 |
feeling of User Relations that interested parties in the PMS standard are being |
| 50 |
hindered by communication issues on the process and procedures required to |
| 51 |
implement changes. |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
For the User Relations team, |
| 54 |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto, Joshua Jackson and Homer Parker" |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
I would like to see a slight expansion in time for 3. (possibly 10 minutes) to address |
| 57 |
this issue. |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
-- |
| 62 |
Andrew D Kirch |
| 63 |
President |
| 64 |
Trance Communications Corp. |
| 65 |
317-436-1024 |
Archives