Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Subject: Re: Voting procedure
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:58:58 -0800
On 00:42 Thu 22 Jan     , Ferris McCormick wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:45:27 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
> 
> > On 14:01 Thu 08 Jan     , Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > > So far we've introduced the _reopen_nominations person in the last vote
> > > and it didn't change a lot. But there are more questions:
> > > 
> > > Does there always have to be 7 council members?
> > 
> > No. I think we should set 7 to be the maximum though -- big meetings get 
> > unwieldy.
> > 
> > > If not, should there be a minimum?
> > 
> > No. Gentoo developers can decide how they want to be led.
> > 
> 
> So, zero is OK and so no Council at all?  Or one?

I think zero means you wouldn't have a council, so you'd violate GLEP 
39. One would be allowable, although I'd be awfully surprised if it ever 
happened.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
Attachment:
pgpQmIVMne1Wm.pgp (PGP signature)
References:
Voting procedure
-- Tiziano Müller
Re: Voting procedure
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: Voting procedure
-- Ferris McCormick
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Voting procedure
Next by thread:
Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
Previous by date:
Re: Voting procedure
Next by date:
Re: Re: Voting procedure


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-council mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.