1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:20:34 +0100 |
3 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> Live template provide correct ordering since generates ebuilds with a |
5 |
>> proper version. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> *sigh* Please stop pushing your epic fail of a non-solution until you |
8 |
> understand the issue at hand. |
9 |
|
10 |
go back to 4chan. |
11 |
|
12 |
> There is no way of using conventional version rules to accurately |
13 |
> represent scm versions across multiple version-branches. _pre does not |
14 |
> order correctly, since you don't know what the next release will be, |
15 |
> and it collides with upstream release names. |
16 |
|
17 |
pre works perfectly fine with snapshots. |
18 |
|
19 |
you cannot track separate branches/versions w/out the very same issues |
20 |
you have merging separate versions of normal packages, and glep54 |
21 |
doesn't say anything about how it should track multiple branches in any |
22 |
different way than the current version components. |
23 |
|
24 |
lu |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
|
28 |
Luca Barbato |
29 |
Gentoo Council Member |
30 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
31 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |