| 1 |
On Friday 26 September 2008, Torsten Veller wrote: |
| 2 |
> We should clearify the "new election" part in time. I think this council |
| 3 |
> started in July 2008 and there will be many meetings that can be missed |
| 4 |
> in the next 9 month. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> As there is already a replacement strategy for devs leaving the council |
| 7 |
> (take the next ranked candidate if the council agrees, else elect one) |
| 8 |
> one might think to use the same for a slacker missing any further |
| 9 |
> meeting. But that doesn't work as the slacker can be elected again: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
just make the replacement strategies the same. replacement for a booted |
| 12 |
slacker is the same for someone who resigns council/Gentoo or is kicked out. |
| 13 |
elections take time and are a hassle. selecting from the original list is a |
| 14 |
lot simpler. |
| 15 |
-mike |
Archives