List Archive: gentoo-council
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 13:04 Sun 16 Nov , Torsten Veller wrote:
> Or did you already remove rank 18?
> | * Whenever a member of the Council loses their position (the reason is
> | irrelevant; they could be booted for slacking or they resign or ...), then
> | the next person in line from the previous Council election is offered the
> | position. If they decline, it is offered to the next person in line, and so
> | forth. If they accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new
> | person, they get the position with a 'reduced' term such that the yearly
> | elections still elect a full group. If the Council does not accept that
> | person, then a new election is held to choose a new member.
> So your options are:
> - Change the rules once again. Because you can.
> - Follow the rules.
Try thinking about this from a different perspective: What is best for
Gentoo? If the rules are broken, they should get fixed instead of
Developer, Gentoo Linux