1 |
On 17:48 Sun 16 Nov , Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
2 |
> If we use this as a criteria for example amne wouldn't have been a |
3 |
> member of the 2007 council - also it would be discuss-worthy if Cardoe |
4 |
> and myself are eligible members for the 2008 council using that |
5 |
> criteria ... I think that criteria simply doesn't work. |
6 |
|
7 |
It's a criterium that only really makes sense with a field of candidates |
8 |
that is more than 2*(# of council spots) along with my additional |
9 |
interpretation that people far below the 7th person are not desired on |
10 |
the council. We additionally know that other people chose not to |
11 |
nominate themselves because they thought that enough good potential |
12 |
members were running. In the general case, you're right. |
13 |
|
14 |
If the election officials had done as Ciaran and I suggested more than |
15 |
once, this wouldn't be a problem. That was to include a "nobody" |
16 |
candidate. Anyone ranked below that would not be eligible for a council |
17 |
position. So I again strongly advise that this be done in the future. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Thanks, |
21 |
Donnie |
22 |
|
23 |
Donnie Berkholz |
24 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
25 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |