| 1 |
On 17:48 Sun 16 Nov , Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
| 2 |
> If we use this as a criteria for example amne wouldn't have been a |
| 3 |
> member of the 2007 council - also it would be discuss-worthy if Cardoe |
| 4 |
> and myself are eligible members for the 2008 council using that |
| 5 |
> criteria ... I think that criteria simply doesn't work. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
It's a criterium that only really makes sense with a field of candidates |
| 8 |
that is more than 2*(# of council spots) along with my additional |
| 9 |
interpretation that people far below the 7th person are not desired on |
| 10 |
the council. We additionally know that other people chose not to |
| 11 |
nominate themselves because they thought that enough good potential |
| 12 |
members were running. In the general case, you're right. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If the election officials had done as Ciaran and I suggested more than |
| 15 |
once, this wouldn't be a problem. That was to include a "nobody" |
| 16 |
candidate. Anyone ranked below that would not be eligible for a council |
| 17 |
position. So I again strongly advise that this be done in the future. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Donnie |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 24 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 25 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives