1 |
On 2009.10.09 22:32, Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 21:56 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
3 |
> > On 2009.10.09 21:13, Petteri Räty wrote: |
4 |
> > > 1. Discuss why follow up for items from last meeting never |
5 |
> happened. |
6 |
> > > Should we do something to ensure this doesn't happen again? |
7 |
> > [snip] |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > Team, |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Yes, it needs to be fixed. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Fixed? |
15 |
> Actually it seems the council is split on if PMS was even worth |
16 |
> keeping |
17 |
> around. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> -- |
21 |
> Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
22 |
> Gentoo Linux |
23 |
> |
24 |
Ned, |
25 |
|
26 |
I think we are talking at cross purposes. The general problem of |
27 |
actions from the last meeting not being followed up and/or lost needs |
28 |
to be fixed. |
29 |
|
30 |
PMS is one example of that general problem, which I was commenting on. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Regards, |
34 |
|
35 |
Roy Bamford |
36 |
(Neddyseagoon) an member of |
37 |
gentoo-ops |
38 |
forum-mods |
39 |
trustees |