Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 17-07-2010 23:33, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 01:05:02AM +0300, Alex Alexander wrote:
>> The Council will have its next meeting on the 26th of July, 2010.
>>
>> The meeting will begin at 1900 UTC.
>>
>> You may use [0] to find out the correct time in your timezone.
>>
>> Here's a draft list of the meeting topics so far:
>> * vote on adding --as-needed to the default profile's LDFLAGS
>> * discuss (and maybe vote on) required-use
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html
>
> Adding eclass removal policy to the agenda; it directly affects devs,
> and the previous policy (imo) is misinterpretted slightly.
>
> Specifically, 06/01/08, portage 2.1.4.4 went stable; this had env
> saving/restoration support. The original council decree was that
> eclasses had to sit for 2 years- I very strongly posit that the time
> period there should've been bound to portage env capabilities rather
> than eclass timelines.
>
> Reasoning is simple enough- w/ a proper PM, eclasses can be
> removed/modified at will without affecting binpkgs/installed pkgs.
>
> So the question I'd like on the agenda is basically if there is any
> reason to preserve the decree- if not, punt it.
I would like to have the council discuss this issue again. We should
probably also address the issue of EAPI changes in eclasses that was
subject of a recent thread in the dev ml.
> ~harring
Let's add to the agenda the use of the invalid DEPEND atom
"EAPI_TOO_OLD" instead of calling die in global scope on eclasses.
I cross-posted this email to both gentoo-dev and gentoo-council mls as
Brian used the former and Alex started this thread in the latter. Which
ML do we want to use?
- --
Regards,
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=N+f/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|