| 1 |
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:20:34 +0100 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Live template provide correct ordering since generates ebuilds with a |
| 4 |
> proper version. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
*sigh* Please stop pushing your epic fail of a non-solution until you |
| 7 |
understand the issue at hand. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
There is no way of using conventional version rules to accurately |
| 10 |
represent scm versions across multiple version-branches. _pre does not |
| 11 |
order correctly, since you don't know what the next release will be, |
| 12 |
and it collides with upstream release names. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
We have been over this before. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives