1 |
On 2010.02.26 02:42, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
2 |
> (We have informally discussed this on the alias but I would like us |
3 |
> to |
4 |
> have a more serious and open discussion about it. It looks like the |
5 |
> agenda for the next meeting isn't going to be as loaded as usual so |
6 |
> it's a good opportunity. I'm posting this in advance of the meeting |
7 |
> announcement so that I can link to here from it.) |
8 |
> |
9 |
> In a few words here is the problem. Is it a good idea to allow |
10 |
> council |
11 |
> members to vote by email when they're not able to make it to the |
12 |
> meeting? If so how? Should that be done before or allowed to be done |
13 |
> after the meeting? Do we want to limit the number of members voting |
14 |
> by |
15 |
> email for a given meeting? What do we do in case there are more votes |
16 |
> by email than the limit we set? Feel free to add more questions and |
17 |
> your opinion. This discussion isn't limited to council members by the |
18 |
> way. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> As usual I'll wait a bit before giving my personal opinion so that |
21 |
> nobody thinks I'm pushing a personal agenda. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Denis. |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
Team, |
27 |
|
28 |
Votes by email must be after the meeting. How else can council members |
29 |
voting by email take into account any discussion on the topic that |
30 |
happened at the meeting? |
31 |
|
32 |
Anything that allows flexibility is a good thing as long as |
33 |
transparency is maintained, so vote emails need to be posted with the |
34 |
records of council meetings. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Regards, |
38 |
|
39 |
Roy Bamford |
40 |
(Neddyseagoon) an member of |
41 |
gentoo-ops |
42 |
forum-mods |
43 |
trustees |