Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-council@g.o
From: Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o>
Subject: Re: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:16:22 +1300
> Hola all-
>  
> Comments desired; assuming no significant blowback, I'll be pushing
> this to the council level since eapi4 is annoying feature locked right
> now.
> 

I think this solution is far better,  until someone smarter than me tells me 
otherwise.

Don't know whether I like the VALID_USE var name,  so please at least think 
about something a little better if you can ;).  ( I like green,  but not too 
green if you know what I mean )

Will we still have to define the use flags in IUSE?

I'm guessing we can't use IUSE to store this information because of the  whole 
glep-55 thing.  IUSE would be my preferred var.  both defining the 
"relationships" and the use flags in only one go.

> Thanks-
> ~harring


Replies:
Re: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative
-- Brian Harring
References:
pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative
-- Brian Harring
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative
Next by thread:
Re: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative
Previous by date:
Re: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative
Next by date:
Re: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative


Updated Nov 13, 2011

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-council mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.