Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o, gentoo@××××××.us
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Stepping back from council duties
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:21:33
Message-Id: 20081116182110.6d1295ac@anaconda.krait.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Stepping back from council duties by Donnie Berkholz
1 On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 09:55:46 -0800
2 Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 13:04 Sun 16 Nov , Torsten Veller wrote:
5 > > Or did you already remove rank 18?
6 > >
7 > > | * Whenever a member of the Council loses their position (the reason is
8 > > | irrelevant; they could be booted for slacking or they resign or ...), then
9 > > | the next person in line from the previous Council election is offered the
10 > > | position. If they decline, it is offered to the next person in line, and so
11 > > | forth. If they accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new
12 > > | person, they get the position with a 'reduced' term such that the yearly
13 > > | elections still elect a full group. If the Council does not accept that
14 > > | person, then a new election is held to choose a new member.
15 > > <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20070208-summary.txt>
16 > >
17 > > So your options are:
18 > > - Change the rules once again. Because you can.
19 > > - Follow the rules.
20 >
21 > Try thinking about this from a different perspective: What is best for
22 > Gentoo? If the rules are broken, they should get fixed instead of
23 > blindly followed.
24 >
25
26 I agree with that. In this case, it seems to me that 7 council members
27 is better for Gentoo than 6, and if the Council members do not
28 unanimously accept anyone down the list, then just hold an election for
29 the missing spot. I think the rules pretty much have it right here.
30
31 I am neither agreeing nor disagreeing with your analysis, as that is a
32 matter for the council members. I'm just saying that rather than hold
33 the position open, just hold a brief election to fill it.
34
35 To save some virtual trees, I'll respond to your other email about your
36 and Ciaran's "nobody" proposal. Good idea, put me in the "support"
37 column.
38
39 Regards,
40 Ferris
41 > --
42 > Thanks,
43 > Donnie
44 >
45 > Donnie Berkholz
46 > Developer, Gentoo Linux
47 > Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
48
49
50 --
51 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
52 Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Stepping back from council duties Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Stepping back from council duties Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>