From: | Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
Cc: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>, gentoo-council@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-council] mtime preservation | ||
Date: | Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:01:39 | ||
Message-Id: | 7c612fc60911191614h5e37c849y50ad217a828fa744@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-council] mtime preservation by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
2 | <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > I honestly don't think we should be going anywhere with this until |
4 | > Portage is using a mechanism that guarantees correct sub-second |
5 | > resolution preservation in all cases. |
6 | |
7 | Any idea, or even the beginning of one, of how to make that happen? |
8 | |
9 | Denis. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-council] mtime preservation | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |