Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: mtime preservation
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:54 -0800
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Zac Medico wrote:
> 
>> Ah, I guess you're right. The documentation led me to believe that
>> os.utime would provide nanosecond-resolution on platforms that
>> support it, but a simple test case seems to indicate that it does not.
> 
> Is there an os.utimes in Python? utime(2) is marked as obsolete in
> POSIX.1-2008 (says the man page).

There is no separate os.utimes function, but it looks like the patch
on this bug might make os.utime behave as desired:

  http://bugs.python.org/issue3425
-- 
Thanks,
Zac


Replies:
Re: Re: mtime preservation
-- Ulrich Mueller
References:
Agenda (draft) for November meeting 2009-11-09
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Agenda (draft) for November meeting 2009-11-09
-- Ciaran McCreesh
mtime preservation (was: Agenda (draft) for November meeting 2009-11-09)
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: mtime preservation (was: Agenda (draft) for November meeting 2009-11-09)
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Re: mtime preservation
-- Zac Medico
Re: Re: mtime preservation
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Re: mtime preservation
-- Zac Medico
Re: Re: mtime preservation
-- Ulrich Mueller
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: mtime preservation
Next by thread:
Re: Re: mtime preservation
Previous by date:
Re: Re: mtime preservation
Next by date:
Re: Re: mtime preservation


Updated Nov 13, 2011

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-council mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.