| 1 |
Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>For patched ebuilds I'd prefer a cygwin-only repo until basic stuff |
| 5 |
>works, |
| 6 |
>no need to stuff another broken arch into the tree. Especially the |
| 7 |
>insane |
| 8 |
>gcc patches and the "new" libc should be kept away from the rest. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>wkr, |
| 11 |
>Patrick |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
I don't see any problems here, I intend (famous last words) to try |
| 15 |
implement Cygwin cleanly, in a manner similar to the xbox. I want Cygwin |
| 16 |
to "just work" rather than making large changes to Gentoo... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
For this to work, a lot of changes may have to happen on the Cygwin side |
| 19 |
of the house, which I think I am capable of doing.. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Trevor |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-cygwin@g.o mailing list |
Archives