| 1 |
Brandon Hale <tseng@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On (12/02/03 01:20), Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 4 |
>> To: gentoo-desktop-research@g.o |
| 5 |
>> From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> |
| 6 |
>> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 01:20:27 -0500 |
| 7 |
>> Subject: [gentoo-desktop-research] Desktop Linux Consortium membership |
| 8 |
>> Reply-To: gentoo-desktop-research@g.o |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I think it's a good idea for Gentoo to apply to become a member of the |
| 11 |
>> Desktop Linux Consortium [1]. Thoughts? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I dont see why not, I would participate. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>> Here's the membership description for that class: |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Associated Members |
| 18 |
>> This class of membership is reserved for the Linux community |
| 19 |
>> organizations that are the heart and soul of the Linux development |
| 20 |
>> process. This includes organizations such as the Debian project, KDE, |
| 21 |
>> Gnome, and many more. Membership in this class will require approval by |
| 22 |
>> the membership committee of the consortium. Associated Members have the |
| 23 |
>> right to nominate 2 of the 11 directors and have access to Consortium |
| 24 |
>> forums and membership events. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> There is no cost for Associated Members. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> This group seems to be the driving force behind actual developments. |
| 29 |
> However in this structure corporate sponsors (the guys that fork over alot of money) hold 7/11 (>½) of votes. Not sure I like how that works... I can see giving incentives for sponsorship, but at the same time why take the power from the people who really know the issues regarding Linux on the desktop. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Right, but if you look at the corporates, they don't seems to be that evil. |
| 33 |
Sure there is no guarantee for the future, but I think it's quite safe for now. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I like the idea |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
dams |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |
Archives