| 1 |
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 15:00, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
| 2 |
> [ sorry my mails are not yet signed, but will be soon ] |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Humm, isn't this a bit weird requirement ? Is this a closed list or not |
| 5 |
? I'm not much of a signer. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I think the above process is not bad at all. So that could be : |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> - define the problem |
| 10 |
> - look if it has not being resolved, or if nobody is working on it, inside gentoo |
| 11 |
> - look for similar problem inside gentoo |
| 12 |
> - look for similar problems outside gentoo (official software author, other |
| 13 |
> distro) |
| 14 |
> - find a way to solve it, by discussing it here or #irc (taht would be the |
| 15 |
> Evaluation part of gerrynjr) |
| 16 |
> - allocate people on it, plan the solving time. |
| 17 |
> - write proposal/recommendations to gentoo main |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Should go trough DTL (whatever it turns out to be) first. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> - fo the main inclusion, I have no precise ideas. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> > - Will we have a seperate cvs testing tree (overlay)? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I don't know, what do you think? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
implementation details.. this is not something that should be solver on |
| 28 |
a per project basis, but distro wide. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> > - How are we going to make sure that the solutions get out of the testing |
| 31 |
> > tree, and in to the main distribution? Will we use GLEP's? |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> why not, but maybe new ebuilds/doc, with official maintainers could suffice? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
No question we should use GLEPs, that's what they are for. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
- foser |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |
Archives