| 1 |
foser <foser@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 13:23, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
>> If the rest of the research people also feel that your proposal is |
| 4 |
>> more important to pursue right now and should be the second project |
| 5 |
>> instead of the installer, I have no problem with that. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Well, it's not about one or the other, we can have both. The menu thing |
| 8 |
> has been long going and actually just misses some left-over research and |
| 9 |
> mostly implementation. But at least it's a goal i think we can achieve |
| 10 |
> within a reasonable time frame and is an obvious improvement to the |
| 11 |
> desktop experience as a whole (as opposed to an installer). I see it |
| 12 |
> didn't even get discussed, which is a bit of a shame. I thought you were |
| 13 |
> on of the initiators behind the initial unified menu proposal spyderous |
| 14 |
> ? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You've mentioned me being an initiator of that a couple of times, and I |
| 17 |
think you must be confusing me with someone else. The only point I had IRT |
| 18 |
the .desktop files was getting upstream to do them instead of us writing |
| 19 |
hundreds. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Donnie |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |
Archives