1 |
foser <foser@g.o> said: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 15:55, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
4 |
>> what's a DTL ? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Desktop TopLevel |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> > I think indeed a solution proposal should go through the desktop lead. I do |
10 |
>> > however see no need if we decide that a problem is not really a problem at |
11 |
>> > all, so it should come somewhere near the place where we choose a solution |
12 |
>> > that is to be implemented. Maybe give some notice beforehand to get |
13 |
>> > confirmation that the destop lead indeed finds it a problem worthy of |
14 |
>> > solving. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> agreed. what should be the notice then? GLEP proposal to desktop lead? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Hmm no, proposal to DTL, then write a GLEP, if it gets rejected already |
19 |
> there's work done for nothing. In practice this could already be the |
20 |
> GLEP outline in it's raw form. |
21 |
|
22 |
ok, sorry for the misunderstanding |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
dams |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |