| 1 |
Rune Morling <gentoo@××.dk> said: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 11/18/03 03:07:19, munky@××××××.com wrote: |
| 4 |
>> In that case, we should establish what programs we would like to |
| 5 |
>> include |
| 6 |
>> in this. First, perhaps it would be more intelligent to establish |
| 7 |
>> categories: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> [snip] |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Nice initiative. Might I suggest you maintain this list and add it to |
| 12 |
> the desktop-research project pages? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> In general, there exist several 'best of breed' applications for |
| 15 |
> different environments so how about adding what apps are native |
| 16 |
> to which DE? I run gnome 2.4 exclusively (this mail is written using |
| 17 |
> the gnome2 MUA balsa which works wonderfully), some run mixed |
| 18 |
> environments, some run pure KDE and yet others run XFCE and |
| 19 |
> some even run a 'non DE' with fluxbox et al. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I think it would make the most sense if we target our efforts on the |
| 22 |
> 'de facto' DE standards (drag n' drop, mime-database etc as embodied |
| 23 |
> in KDE, gnome and XFCE). |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> In other words if someone decides that fluxbox is really cool, |
| 26 |
> rxvt+mutt is the only 'non-bloated' MUA solution, drag n' drop |
| 27 |
> is a some fancy new-fangled concept of no real use, mime-type-handling |
| 28 |
> is a shortlived fad, then, well, he/she isn't really in the target |
| 29 |
> audience for the 'gentoo desktop experience'. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Anyway, target audience is a central concept and I can't help but |
| 32 |
> wonder where we are in this respect. Comments please! |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Please read the manifest |
| 35 |
(http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/research/manifest.xml), there is a |
| 36 |
definition of what a desktop related issue is. Thus you can see what |
| 37 |
application should be handled or not. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
dams |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |
Archives