1 |
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 16:09, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
2 |
> If I see correctly, the things that makes ugly fonts : |
3 |
> |
4 |
> - bad looking fonts |
5 |
> - missing fonts (so it uses not suited ones) |
6 |
> - badly configured xft*/fontconfig |
7 |
> - software not using last freetype/xft ... |
8 |
> |
9 |
> ( feel free to add reasons if I missed som) |
10 |
> |
11 |
> So, to clarify, we could : |
12 |
> - run some test to see if fonts are ugly in common use in different languages |
13 |
> (I'll do some test cause I have a fresh gentoo) |
14 |
|
15 |
Here you already have a problem, the perception of font quality differs |
16 |
per-person and language. Some people really dislike AA (requires |
17 |
different fonts to be good), others use different types of displays, |
18 |
etc. And not latin language users usually know that they need extra |
19 |
packs to have decent support, don't expect anything non-latin to look |
20 |
good by default atm. |
21 |
|
22 |
> - go through default available fonts (after having emerged kde and gnome), and |
23 |
> list the ugliest ones |
24 |
|
25 |
Again this is mostly a personal thing and it currently also depends on |
26 |
how you install xfree (this is in flux). |
27 |
|
28 |
> - check the fontconfig, xft configurations |
29 |
> - list known software that doesn't use the good font systems. |
30 |
|
31 |
That is not something up to us really, i don't feel it is our duty to |
32 |
make legacy applications look good, what matters to me is to get a |
33 |
current desktop (KDE/GNOME/XFCE4) reasonably ok/consistent looking |
34 |
fontwise (for as far as it isn't). |
35 |
|
36 |
> Whith that done we'll be able to see where the problems are, wnd decide if we |
37 |
> want to : |
38 |
> - wait |
39 |
> - try to get new fonts (many additional set of fonts by default) |
40 |
> - change font configuration |
41 |
> - change software so that they use latest technology (I have seen in the past |
42 |
> some patchs to make this and that use freetype2, I think OpenOffice had such a |
43 |
> patch, but I thougt it was in the main now) |
44 |
|
45 |
It uses freetype2 allright, but it's own copy. |
46 |
|
47 |
> In addition, we can think of making font managment easy for the user. (I wrote |
48 |
> the font managment tool for mandrakeLinux, he had some working features, but |
49 |
> uses old font tools). |
50 |
|
51 |
Ehm, no please. Config defaults should be good enough, users should not |
52 |
be exposed to this via another GUI. Gnome already has a sufficient font |
53 |
settings panel and ways to install fonts, so does KDE to my knowledge. I |
54 |
don't like more ways to set the same thing on the same level (in this |
55 |
case on GUI level), it is confusing. |
56 |
|
57 |
> btw do we have i18n/fonts gurus @ gentoo? |
58 |
|
59 |
a few i18n wannabees.. but they're not the most active devs. I'm |
60 |
supposed to be the font guru cause i've handled bugs/updates in these |
61 |
things for some time and did most of the xft2 move coordination/work. |
62 |
|
63 |
Although they are connected, setting up fonts has little to do with |
64 |
i18n. |
65 |
|
66 |
- foser |
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 |
-- |
70 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |