1 |
foser <foser@g.o> said: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 21:01, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > Since avenj was too lazy to subscribe =P : |
6 |
> > <avenj> wasn't there some kind of potential performance hit there? |
7 |
> > <avenj> i thought i was thinking someone thought part of the issue with |
8 |
> > RH's performance was utf8 default, but now i'm thinking i'm not sure |
9 |
> |
10 |
> You don't mean python's alleged performance hit (this got shortly |
11 |
> discussed on -dev by lqx) ? To attribute a full systems performance to |
12 |
> UTF-8 sounds far fetched to me. Anyway, the benefits likely outclass |
13 |
> performance loss. |
14 |
|
15 |
<AOL> |
16 |
|
17 |
utf8 will have to be chosen as default one day. we need to use it asap |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
dams |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |