List Archive: gentoo-desktop-research
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 09 October 2003 15:15, foser wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 15:00, dams@... wrote:
> > [ sorry my mails are not yet signed, but will be soon ]
>
> Humm, isn't this a bit weird requirement ? Is this a closed list or not
> ? I'm not much of a signer.
>
I sign, but have no problem at all if people don't. For me it is not necessary
to require it.
> > - define the problem
> > - look if it has not being resolved, or if nobody is working on it,
> > inside gentoo - look for similar problem inside gentoo
> > - look for similar problems outside gentoo (official software author,
> > other distro)
> > - find a way to solve it, by discussing it here or #irc (taht would be
> > the Evaluation part of gerrynjr)
> > - allocate people on it, plan the solving time.
> > - write proposal/recommendations to gentoo main
>
> Should go trough DTL (whatever it turns out to be) first.
I think indeed a solution proposal should go through the desktop lead. I do
however see no need if we decide that a problem is not really a problem at
all, so it should come somewhere near the place where we choose a solution
that is to be implemented. Maybe give some notice beforehand to get
confirmation that the destop lead indeed finds it a problem worthy of
solving.
>
> implementation details.. this is not something that should be solver on
> a per project basis, but distro wide.
There are ideas floating around to do this distro wide. However if no-one
pushes for it, it will happen "sometime".
>
> No question we should use GLEPs, that's what they are for.
Ok, I agree. This also automatically gives the desktop lead a place.
Paul
- --
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@g.o
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/hWOFbKx5DBjWFdsRAscmAKCeurFkWFnds4IWbEWmD350r0QPSACgk7st
dOmYWMZ0nL2jr6arjtvRujw=
=td+2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list
|
|