| 1 |
foser <foser@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 15:55, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
| 4 |
>> what's a DTL ? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Desktop TopLevel |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> > I think indeed a solution proposal should go through the desktop lead. I do |
| 10 |
>> > however see no need if we decide that a problem is not really a problem at |
| 11 |
>> > all, so it should come somewhere near the place where we choose a solution |
| 12 |
>> > that is to be implemented. Maybe give some notice beforehand to get |
| 13 |
>> > confirmation that the destop lead indeed finds it a problem worthy of |
| 14 |
>> > solving. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> agreed. what should be the notice then? GLEP proposal to desktop lead? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Hmm no, proposal to DTL, then write a GLEP, if it gets rejected already |
| 19 |
> there's work done for nothing. In practice this could already be the |
| 20 |
> GLEP outline in it's raw form. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
ok, sorry for the misunderstanding |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
dams |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |
Archives