1 |
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 14:38 -0300, Luis Diaz wrote: |
2 |
> hi, im new in the list, im luis from argentina, |
3 |
> i send this mail again because the first was to tony, there is |
4 |
> somthing wrong with the reply here :S |
5 |
> |
6 |
> |
7 |
> not providing an fstab at all would make some ppl crazy trying to |
8 |
> rememmber the syntaxis of the file, also an script to make one wont be |
9 |
> bad idea, after all there is a genkernel, why not a genfstab |
10 |
|
11 |
Ask and you shall receive... |
12 |
|
13 |
http://evvl.rustedhalo.net/software/gentoo/gen-fstab/gen-fstab-0.1 |
14 |
|
15 |
Now, what it could really use is a *bunch* more testing. |
16 |
|
17 |
And really, would it be that hard to |
18 |
"cp /usr/share/doc/baselayout-1.9.4-r6/fstab.example /etc/fstab" before |
19 |
running nano -w fstab? |
20 |
|
21 |
It would be a simple step that would keep the fstab from every being |
22 |
automatically overwritten by a baselayout upgrade. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Chris Gianelloni |
26 |
Release Engineering - Operational/QA Manager |
27 |
Games - Developer |
28 |
Gentoo Linux |