Gentoo Archives: gentoo-desktop

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-desktop@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop] Re: KDE 4.5.4 distfiles missing
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:18:13
Message-Id: ig25g1$mvr$2@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-desktop] Re: KDE 4.5.4 distfiles missing by "Marián Kyral"
1 On 01/05/2011 05:32 PM, Marián Kyral wrote:
2 >> ------------ Pùvodní zpráva ------------
3 >> Od: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
4 >> Pøedmìt: [gentoo-desktop] Re: KDE 4.5.4 distfiles missing
5 >> Datum: 05.1.2011 16:22:02
6 >> ----------------------------------------
7 >> On 12/07/2010 09:43 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
8 >> > On 11/29/2010 05:19 PM, Duncan wrote:
9 >> >> Alex Schuster posted on Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:49:36 +0100 as excerpted:
10 >> >>
11 >> >>> KDE 4.5.4 is in the kde overlay for some days now. But I cannot
12 >> emerge
13 >> >>> it because all *-4.5.4.tar.bz2 distfiles are missing on the servers.
14 >> >>>
15 >> >>> Any idea why this is?
16 >> >>
17 >> >> It hasn't actually been released upstream, yet. Normally, the kde team
18 >> >> put a mask in the overlay before they add the new ebuilds in
19 >> preparation,
20 >> >> then simply unmask them on the day of release
21 >> >
22 >> > That is actually not what happens most of the time. Usually the user
23 >> has
24 >> > to mask stuff.
25 >> >
26 >> > In rare cases, the overlay masks the packages properly. About 20% of
27 >> > time, I'd say.
28 >>
29 >> Happened again. The 4.6 RC2 tarballs is not available yet, but it's
30 >> not masked anyway.
31 >>
32 >> It would be awesome if the kde guys could mask the stuff, since it's a
33 >> lot of packages to mask by hand and it totally breaks emerge -u world.
34 >>
35 > Hi,
36 > you should try the "--keep-going" emerge option.
37 >
38 > And then you can make it default by putting line below to /etc/make.conf
39 > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--keep-going"
40
41 No that's too messy. You have to watch for packages that don't have
42 tarballs, like kde-env which will break KDE if installed.
43
44 I created a custom unmask file to solve the issue. But it would be
45 better if there was a 4.5.90-specific unmask file to begin with.
46
47 In the end, it's not a very big deal. Just a major annoyance :-)